Philadelphia
One of the first big-city wireless efforts in the country. What its history teaches about financing, partnerships and planning for the long term.
Across the U.S., nonprofits, cities, schools and neighbors are building their own wireless networks to bring affordable internet to low-income homes and public places. The Community Wireless Coalition connects these networks, studies what makes them sustainable, and brings that evidence to policymakers.
The Community Wireless Coalition supports nonprofit and municipal community wireless network providers that make affordable, reliable internet available to underserved and low-income people at home and in public places.
Every person in this country should have access to affordable internet service at home and in their neighborhood, regardless of their income.
Affordable internet helps people find jobs, see a doctor, continue their education and reach government services. While billions of dollars go to bring broadband to rural areas, inner-city communities are often overlooked. Community wireless networks help fill that gap.
We bring network builders together on regular calls to share what works, solve problems and build relationships.
We develop and share research on what these networks cost, how they earn revenue and what keeps them running.
We educate federal, state and local policymakers about the value of community wireless and the rules and funding that help it succeed.
Community wireless networks have grown up in communities large and small. Not every one has thrived. Geography, rights-of-way, population density, anchor institution support, funding, equipment costs and leadership all shape whether a network lasts.
One of the first big-city wireless efforts in the country. What its history teaches about financing, partnerships and planning for the long term.
Neighborhood and volunteer-built networks alongside city programs. How community ownership changes the cost of connecting a building.
Connecting public housing and anchor institutions. How local partners divide the work of building, operating and supporting a network.
Know a community network we should profile? Email us at info@communitywirelesscoalition.org.
Debates over community broadband often stall on one question: can these networks pay for themselves? Good answers are rare because few networks report their finances the same way.
Our research uses one framework for every network we study, splitting startup capital from operating costs and tracking each source of revenue. That makes it possible to compare a volunteer network in one city with a municipal network in another.
Each study asks four questions:
| Capital · build-out | |
|---|---|
| Radios, access points, antennas | $ / node |
| Rooftop and pole attachment rights | $ / site |
| Backhaul and fiber connection | $ / link |
| Installation labor (paid and volunteer) | hrs, $ |
| Operating · per year | |
| Upstream internet transit | $ / Mbps |
| Maintenance and equipment replacement | $ / yr |
| Staff, support, and digital-skills help | $ / yr |
| Revenue | |
| Subscriber fees or donations | $ / home / mo |
| Federal programs (e.g. E-Rate for schools & libraries) | $ / yr |
| State and local grants or contracts | $ / yr |
| Philanthropy | $ / yr |
| Cost per household connected | $ / mo |
There is no single recipe. These are the main models among the networks the coalition works with.
Local organizations and volunteers install and run the equipment, often on rooftops, and offer service free or at low cost to their neighbors.
ExamplesPhilly Community Wireless · Seattle Community Network
A city or town builds and owns the network, often using its own fiber, poles and buildings.
ExampleBLink Community Network, Council Bluffs, IA
A school district, library or education agency extends its network beyond its buildings to reach students and residents at home.
ExamplesConnectMe, Boulder Valley, CO · BorderLink, Imperial County, CA · San Jose Free Community Wi-Fi, CA
A city partners with a nonprofit that builds and operates the network on its behalf.
ExampleDigitalC, Cleveland, OH
Small local wireless internet providers (WISPs) that focus on underserved and low-income communities.
ExamplesComing soon
Broadband decisions are made in Washington, in state capitals and at city hall. Local leaders are best placed to build these networks, but they need the support of policymakers at every level.
How community networks fit within federal broadband and affordability programs, and which rules make it easier or harder for them to take part.
How states can include community networks in grant programs, and how state laws on municipal broadband affect local options.
What a city can contribute, such as rooftops, poles, fiber and public buildings, and what it realistically costs to support a network.
Need a briefing or a source for a hearing? Email us at info@communitywirelesscoalition.org.
The coalition is open to the organizations building community wireless networks and the companies and funders who help them.
Community Wi-Fi networks, municipal and anchor institution networks, nonprofit providers and small WISPs serving underserved and low-income communities.
Equipment manufacturers, consultants, wireless designers and other companies that support community and municipal networks.
Foundations and corporate sponsors that fund research, practitioner convenings and the coalition's work with policymakers.
Membership is not open to large national carriers, such as the major cellular and cable companies.
Questions, or ready to join? Email info@communitywirelesscoalition.org.
The Community Wireless Coalition was founded to give community networks a clear, evidence-based voice in broadband policy.
John Windhausen, Jr. is the founder of Telepoly, an online portal of information and analysis of broadband policy issues. He is the former Executive Director of the Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband (SHLB) Coalition, a public interest advocacy organization based in Washington DC.
Mr. Windhausen formerly led a telecommunications trade association and served for nine years on Capitol Hill as a staff counsel for the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee. He began his career as a staff attorney at the Federal Communications Commission in 1984.
He has a B.A. from Yale University and a J.D. from the UCLA School of Law.